contact@realeye.io + 1 646 9803603 Sign Up Sign In English
See through your customers' eyes!

by Adam Cellary

DEC 8th @11AM EST and @11AM CET
1 HOUR ONLINE LIVE EVENT

Learn how to conduct online eye-tracking research in 3 simple steps using RealEye

Save your spot

Registration now open!

Research about Dynamics of visual attention during online lectures

Beata Lewandowska, Kasia Wisiecka, RealEye, SWPS
8 min read

When COVID-19 appeared, many activities were brought online. This applies to learning - schools and Universities had to find a way to fulfill their task without meeting students in person. Most of them, like the rest of the world, started using videoconference tools like ZOOM, MS Teams or Google Meet. But is teaching this way as effective as the traditional approach?

Declarative studies show that students and lecturers positively assess remote learning, but there is no evidence of the impact of online learning on the objective indicators of visual attention and information processing. It is also not known how social cues (e.g. the faces of other students) during the presentation, lack of eye contact between teacher and students, and cognitive overload caused by looking at the computer screen affect information processing. To evaluate those factors deeper, researchers from the SWPS University and Clemson University conducted an eye-tracking study, using the RealEye software. They wanted to analyze 3 aspects:

  • the distribution of visual attention between presentation, teacher, other students, and one's own face;
  • the visual attention distribution in the groups with low and high scores from the post-lecture knowledge test;
  • the relationship between lecture-related knowledge and dynamics of visual processing (ambient/focal attention) during the lecture.

In this study, 24 students participated. They calibrated in the eye-tracking software and attended in 15 minutes long online lecture. Students were informed, that they can behave naturally and ask questions. After the lecture, they were asked six questions about the content of the class and to self-report about difficulties experienced during the lecture in three areas: level of concentration, cognitive load, and interaction quality. After the test, participants were divided into two groups: the low score group (11 students with less than 50% good responses) and the high score group (13 students with more than 50% good responses).

The analysis part focused not only on the distribution but also the dynamics of visual attention, which enabled researchers to evaluate students’ attention depth during the lecture. Two types of visual attention can be distinguished: ambient - characterized by short duration fixations followed by long saccades, and focal - long fixations with shorter saccades. The more focal the processing of the stimuli is, the deeper attention is given (indicates active processing of the information). During any visual acquisition task, attention switches between those two types constantly, which is described by a K-coefficient:

  • K > 0 means focal processing,
  • K < 0 means ambient processing.

Results were analyzed for four areas of interest (AOI): over the presentation displayed during the lecture, the teacher, each student’s own face (self), and the rest of the students.

When researchers compared students’ knowledge from the lecture and self-reported measures of concentration, cognitive load, and interaction difficulty they found that cognitive load is negatively related to the task score whereas concentration positively :

Next, they discovered the difference in the distribution of visual attention on different AOI between students with low and high scores. The high score group spent significantly more time looking at the teacher and significantly less time at themselves, and other students.

This aspect was also analyzed based on the average fixation duration, which indicates deeper visual processing - it was different between groups only when looking at the area related to the presentation. The high score group had longer fixation duration at the presentation than the low score group.

The last analyzed aspect was the relation between K-coefficient (ambient/focal attention) and test score. The average K value significantly predicted the test score. The more focal attention, the higher score was achieved.

To summarize the results showed that:

  • Students with higher knowledge test scores looked more at the teacher’s face and less attention to other students the images of other students during the lecture provide more interference than benefit.
  • The self-image caught more visual attention of students with a lower test score.
  • The average fixation duration on the presentation was longer for those who memorized more from the lecture - it indicates deeper visual processing in this group.
  • The test score was positively correlated with students' focal attention (K-coefficient).

Findings from this study can be used in developing real-time alerting systems for teachers, as it may be valuable to observe the level of focal attention during the class to understand the current level of students’ concentration, which can suggest, for example, when to take a break. Results may be also used in the customization of the classroom interface so that students can focus attention on the most relevant information during the online lecture.

Read the full article:

Wisiecka, K., Krejtz, K., Krejtz, I. & Duchowski, A. (2022). Dynamics of visual attention during online lectures - evidence from webcam eye tracking. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 1220-1230). New York City, NY, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 8, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/221437/.

Stefan Papadakis
Stefan Papadakis
IPSOS logo
Stefan Papadakis
Insight Consultant, IPSOS

"Webcam-based eye-tracking has vast potential within market research and RealEye made a great effort customizing their solutions to our needs. We succeeded in having live online interviews with eye-tracking included and we look forward to build on this pilot study to take further advantage of this solution in future research."

David HotJar
HotJar logo
David Darmanin
CEO, hotjar.com

"I'm really impressed with what Adam has created with RealEye. It's astounding how easy and fast it is to track and report on eye movement for a page or design."

Trusted by freelancers, small to big companies, students, and universities.

Frequently Asked Questions

RealEye studies are proven to be around 110 px accurate. This allows analyzing users interaction on a website with precision reaching the size of a single button.
We predict the gaze point with frequency up to 60 Hz.

For in-depth analysis of webcam eye-tracking accuracy check the following articles:

Either your own or RealEye participants. You can invite your users or panel and share the study with them using a participation link. All they need to have is a laptop/PC with a webcam.

We also have a network of panelists from all over the world - mainly from the UK and the US. Randomly picked users can be assigned to your task. They are called RealEye participants. We will not show them your stimuli before the test starts, so their interaction will be natural.

Note: RealEye participants can't take part in a 'Live Website' studies and studies longer than 10 minutes. Read more about the limitations here.

There are only monthly payments, so there’s no possibility to pay per study. But keep in mind that you can cancel your license any time (even in the same month) - you’ll keep the account access until the end of the billing period (30 days from the last payment).
You can easily integrate the RealEye tool with external tools (eg. surveys), but also compare the results obtained from other tools using our CSV file (i.e. by the timestamp).

Start Today!